¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ

A Restrictive Covenant Agreement protects businesses by limiting what employees can do during and after their employment. These contracts typically stop workers from sharing company secrets, working for competitors, or poaching clients and colleagues for a specific time period after leaving.

Courts across the U.S. enforce these agreements differently, but they generally require reasonable limits on time, geography, and scope to be valid. For example, a one-year ban on working for competitors within 50 miles might be acceptable, while a nationwide ban lasting five years likely wouldn't hold up. Many states also require employers to offer something valuable, like a promotion or bonus, when asking current employees to sign.

Use a Restrictive Covenant Agreement when hiring employees who will have access to valuable company information or strong client relationships. This is especially important for roles in sales, technical development, executive leadership, or any position handling trade secrets, customer lists, or proprietary processes.

The ideal time to introduce these agreements is during the initial hiring process, before an employee gains access to sensitive information. For existing employees, link the agreement to a promotion, raise, or new responsibilities. Many companies also use these agreements during mergers and acquisitions to protect customer relationships and intellectual property from departing employees.

• Employee Covenant Agreement: The standard version focused on protecting company interests from departing employees
• Non-Compete Agreement: Restricts employees from working for competitors or starting competing businesses
• Non-Solicitation Agreement: Prevents poaching clients or recruiting former coworkers
• Confidentiality Covenant: Focuses specifically on protecting trade secrets and proprietary information
• Customer Non-Interference Agreement: Protects client relationships and prevents direct customer contact after departure

• Employers: Companies that create and enforce these agreements to protect their business interests, often through their HR or legal departments
• Employees: Workers who must sign and comply with the restrictions, typically those in senior roles or with access to sensitive information
• Employment Lawyers: Draft and review agreements to ensure enforceability under state laws and help resolve disputes
• HR Managers: Implement and maintain these agreements as part of employment packages and handle initial enforcement
• Business Owners: Small and medium-sized business owners who rely on these agreements to protect client relationships and trade secrets

• Business Scope: Define exactly what needs protection - trade secrets, customer relationships, or specialized knowledge
• Geographic Limits: Map out realistic territorial restrictions based on your actual business footprint
• Time Duration: Choose reasonable restriction periods, typically 6-24 months depending on state laws
• Employee Details: Gather job titles, access levels, and responsibilities to justify restrictions
• State Laws: Check local enforcement rules - California rarely enforces non-competes, while Florida generally supports them
• Consideration: Plan what you'll offer in exchange - new hires can sign for employment, existing employees need additional benefits

• Identification Section: Names and details of both employer and employee, plus effective date
• Scope of Restrictions: Clear definition of prohibited activities and protected information
• Duration and Territory: Specific time periods and geographic boundaries for restrictions
• Consideration Clause: What the employee receives in exchange for agreeing (job offer, bonus, etc.)
• Confidentiality Terms: Detailed description of protected information and handling requirements
• Enforcement Provisions: Consequences of violations and remedies available to the employer
• Severability Clause: Ensures partial enforcement if some provisions are invalid

A Restrictive Covenant Agreement differs significantly from an Advisory Agreement in several key aspects. While both protect business interests, they serve distinct purposes and operate differently in practice.

• Scope of Protection: Restrictive Covenants limit future actions like competing or soliciting clients, while Advisory Agreements focus on current service delivery and confidentiality during the advisory relationship
• Duration of Effect: Restrictive Covenants typically extend beyond employment termination, while Advisory Agreements usually only remain active during the advisory period
• Enforceability Requirements: Restrictive Covenants need reasonable geographic and time limits to be enforceable, while Advisory Agreements face fewer restrictions
• Primary Purpose: Restrictive Covenants protect against future competition and information misuse, while Advisory Agreements establish roles, compensation, and deliverables for consulting services