������Ƶ

An Environmental, Social and Governance Compliance Framework helps organizations track and meet their sustainability, community, and leadership commitments under NZ law. It sets clear standards for managing environmental impacts, supporting social responsibilities, and maintaining ethical business practices in line with the Companies Act 1993 and Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

For Kiwi businesses, this framework guides decisions on everything from carbon reduction targets and waste management to fair labor practices and board diversity. It's particularly important for listed companies, crown entities, and organizations seeking to align with Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles while demonstrating transparent, responsible operations to stakeholders and regulators.

Consider implementing an Environmental, Social and Governance Compliance Framework when your organization faces growing stakeholder pressure about sustainability commitments or needs to demonstrate responsible business practices to investors and regulators. This framework becomes essential during capital raising, market listing preparations, or when expanding operations with significant environmental or social impacts.

It's particularly valuable for companies navigating Te Ao M��ori principles, managing climate-related financial disclosures under the Financial Markets Conduct Act, or responding to the increasing focus on corporate governance from the Financial Markets Authority. Many organizations also use it to align their operations with the Zero Carbon Act requirements and strengthen their social license to operate.

• Basic ESG Framework: Focuses on fundamental environmental metrics, social responsibility policies, and governance structures - ideal for small to medium enterprises starting their ESG journey
• Comprehensive Corporate Framework: Includes detailed carbon accounting, stakeholder engagement protocols, and board oversight mechanisms for listed companies
• Industry-Specific Framework: Tailored to sectors like agriculture or manufacturing, with specific provisions for resource management and iwi consultation
• Financial Services Framework: Emphasizes responsible investment criteria, climate risk disclosure, and alignment with Financial Markets Authority guidelines
• Public Sector Framework: Adapted for crown entities and local government, incorporating Te Tiriti obligations and public accountability measures

• Board Directors: Approve and oversee the framework's implementation, ensuring alignment with corporate strategy and risk management
• Sustainability Officers: Draft and maintain the framework, monitor compliance, and report on ESG performance metrics
• Legal Teams: Review framework components against NZ regulations, Financial Markets Authority guidelines, and industry standards
• Department Managers: Implement specific aspects of the framework within their operations and report on progress
• External Stakeholders: Including investors, iwi partners, and regulatory bodies who rely on the framework to assess organizational performance

• Current State Assessment: Audit existing environmental practices, social policies, and governance structures
• Stakeholder Input: Gather feedback from board members, management, iwi partners, and key stakeholders
• Regulatory Review: Map relevant NZ legislation, including Financial Markets Conduct Act and Zero Carbon Act requirements
• Industry Benchmarking: Research peer organizations' ESG frameworks and sector-specific standards
• Data Systems Check: Evaluate capability to measure and report on chosen ESG metrics
• Implementation Plan: Draft clear timelines, responsibilities, and resource requirements for framework rollout

• Environmental Metrics: Clear targets for carbon emissions, waste management, and resource use aligned with Zero Carbon Act
• Social Impact Framework: Policies on workforce diversity, community engagement, and Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations
• Governance Structure: Board oversight mechanisms, reporting lines, and compliance monitoring procedures
• Risk Management: Identification and mitigation strategies for ESG-related risks
• Reporting Requirements: Disclosure protocols aligned with FMA guidelines and NZX listing rules
• Implementation Plan: Timelines, responsibilities, and review mechanisms for framework components
• Stakeholder Engagement: Processes for consulting with shareholders, iwi, and community groups

An Environmental, Social and Governance Compliance Framework differs significantly from a Corporate Governance Guidelines in several key ways. While both documents support organizational compliance, their scope and application serve distinct purposes in New Zealand's regulatory landscape.

• Scope and Coverage: ESG Frameworks encompass broader sustainability metrics, social impact, and governance structures, while Corporate Governance Guidelines focus specifically on board operations and management oversight
• Regulatory Context: ESG Frameworks align with multiple regulations including the Zero Carbon Act and FMA requirements, whereas Corporate Governance Guidelines primarily address Companies Act obligations
• Stakeholder Engagement: ESG Frameworks require active engagement with iwi, community groups, and environmental stakeholders; Corporate Governance Guidelines mainly involve shareholders and directors
• Implementation Approach: ESG Frameworks demand ongoing measurement and reporting across multiple dimensions, while Corporate Governance Guidelines typically outline static procedural requirements