¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ

A Tolling Agreement pauses the legal time limit for filing a lawsuit, giving parties more time to resolve their dispute without rushing to court. It's like hitting a pause button on the statute of limitations - the deadline that normally restricts how long someone has to sue.

Both sides often use these agreements to explore settlement options, share information, or negotiate without the pressure of an impending deadline. For example, if you have a contract dispute in California with a two-year filing deadline, a Tolling Agreement could extend that time while you work things out. This can save everyone time and money by avoiding unnecessary litigation.

Consider using a Tolling Agreement when you need more time to investigate and negotiate a potential legal claim without filing a lawsuit immediately. This commonly happens in complex commercial disputes, construction defect cases, or environmental claims where gathering evidence takes significant time.

The agreement becomes especially valuable when you're close to the statute of limitations deadline but still working toward a settlement. For example, if you discover construction defects near the end of your state's filing period, a Tolling Agreement lets you thoroughly investigate the issues and negotiate with contractors while preserving your legal rights.

• Basic Time Extension: The simplest form of Tolling Agreement just pauses the statute of limitations for a set period.
• Limited-Scope Agreements: Restricts tolling to specific claims or issues while preserving others for immediate litigation.
• Information Exchange Agreements: Includes provisions for sharing documents and conducting informal discovery during the tolling period.
• Settlement-Focused Agreements: Adds specific negotiation requirements and mediation deadlines alongside the time extension.
• Conditional Tolling: Links the time extension to specific events or milestones, like completing an investigation or receiving regulatory approval.

• Potential Plaintiffs: Individuals or companies considering legal action but needing more time to investigate or negotiate their claims.
• Potential Defendants: Parties facing possible lawsuits who prefer exploring settlement options before formal litigation begins.
• Corporate Legal Departments: In-house counsel who draft and negotiate these agreements to manage litigation risks.
• Outside Law Firms: Attorneys who advise clients on tolling strategies and prepare agreements that protect their clients' interests.
• Insurance Companies: Insurers involved in claims negotiations who use these agreements to facilitate settlement discussions.

• Identify Claims: List all potential legal claims and causes of action that need tolling.
• Check Deadlines: Research applicable statutes of limitations for each claim in your jurisdiction.
• Set Duration: Determine how long the tolling period should last, including any extension options.
• Define Scope: Specify which parties and claims are covered by the agreement.
• Document Exchange: Outline any information sharing requirements during the tolling period.
• Draft Clear Terms: Our platform helps generate precise language that courts will enforce, eliminating common drafting pitfalls.

• Identification Section: Names and details of all parties involved, including their legal status.
• Effective Date: Clear start date and duration of the tolling period.
• Claims Description: Specific claims or disputes covered by the agreement.
• Tolling Period: Explicit statement of how the statute of limitations is paused.
• Termination Clause: Conditions for ending the agreement and required notice.
• Governing Law: Jurisdiction and applicable state laws.
• Mutual Consideration: Benefits each party receives from the agreement.
• Signatures: Authorized signatories and execution requirements.

A Tolling Agreement differs significantly from an Arbitration Agreement, though both aim to manage dispute resolution. While a Tolling Agreement temporarily pauses legal deadlines to allow time for negotiation, an Arbitration Agreement commits parties to resolve disputes outside of court entirely.

• Timing and Duration: Tolling Agreements are temporary measures focused on extending statutes of limitations, while Arbitration Agreements create permanent alternative dispute resolution frameworks.
• Court Access: Tolling Agreements preserve the right to pursue court action later, whereas Arbitration Agreements typically waive that right.
• Purpose: Tolling Agreements buy time for investigation and negotiation, while Arbitration Agreements establish a complete alternative to litigation.
• Enforcement Method: Tolling Agreements simply pause legal deadlines, while Arbitration Agreements create binding obligations to use specific dispute resolution procedures.